There have been many excellent observations and questions regarding what actually went down in Congress at the most recent UAP hearing - they deserve to be answered. The confusion is understandable, especially given that falsehoods regarding chain of custody have been been allowed to linger, unanswered.

When whistleblowers come forward, approaching journalists can be complicated and risky for everyone involved. Building trust is a dynamic process - a delicate dance that changes with each situation.

Because I had already built a relationship with numerous members of Congress, I was able to facilitate in-person meetings between the “Immaculate Constellation” whistleblower and select members. This was both to substantiate the document’s authenticity and claims - as well as to prepare the landscape for potential public testimony under oath in Congressional hearings.

Keep in mind, George Knapp’s and my work to get the “Immaculate Constellation” report into the Congressional Record, began before the term “Immaculate Constellation” was even publicly known. So inherrently, this process involved calculated risks, such as bringing the author to confidential meetings to add a human face to the words on paper - something critical for scrutiny at the Congressional level.

CHAIN OF CUSTODY

The submission of the “Immaculate Constellation” report into the Congressional Record occurred in multiple steps over numerous months - to allow Congress appropriate time for independent investigation and vetting:

SEPTEMBER 2024

Submitted to select members of Congress for review and vetting. I introduced the whistleblower in person, typically unannounced, to protect confidentiality until trust was established.

TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE HEARING

Resubmitted to the Oversight & Accountability Committee for strict and targeted distribution among key decision-makers.

NIGHT BEFORE THE HEARING

Delivered in complete form to two trusted members of Congress who would decide if final authorization was granted - to place the report into the Congressional Record.

MORNING OF THE HEARING

As requested by Congress - submitted one final time, with formal demarcations verifying the authorized, authenticated version meant for duplication - with formal acknowledgment that the submission in-full, would officially be submitted into the Congressional Record.

THE MISSING 12TH PAGE

I was asked by members to provide written context and personal testimony for the Congressional Record, to accompany the submission of the whistleblower’s official report into the Congressional Record. I wrote an explanatory cover-page to introduce and accompany the document. This is the “missing 12th page” people are asking about. It was excluded from the Congressional Record when the submission’s chain of custody was misrepresented by certain members of Congress.

WHY THIS MATTERS

The rigorous vetting process undertaken to submit the “Immaculate Constellation” report into the Congressional Record has been misrepresented. The false narrative about who facilitated its submission has been allowed to persist - unchecked - to this day.

This is not about credit or a clerical error. It’s about chain of custody, accuracy, and transparency - the very principles we are demanding in this space. Ironically, it is also about oversight and accountability - the regulatory body that was complicit in the falsifying and misrepresentation of the Congressional Record.

I have reported the facts exactly as they happened, yet it remains puzzling that this misrepresentation was never corrected - either during or immediately after the hearing. I hope this clarifies some of your questions. Naturally, I now have even bigger ones of my own.

This painstaking process - securing an official chain of custody, building trust, and preparing for submission into the Congressional Record - was designed to protect the whistleblower and ensure the integrity of the “Immaculate Constellation” report. It was, and remains, the first step in fulfilling an American patriot’s commitment to coming forward and testifying on record.

Soon, the author of the “Immaculate Constellation” report will speak for himself.

Weaponize Your Curiosity,